Jesse Riles v. Paul L Friedman
Plaintiff: Jesse Riles
Defendant: Paul L Friedman
Case Number: 2:2010cv03542
Filed: May 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Manuel L. Real re MOTION to Dismiss Case 5 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed. Since the defects stated cannot be corrected by amendment, the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the futility doctrine. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (esa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jesse Riles v. Paul L Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul L Friedman
Represented By: Jonathan B Klinck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Riles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?