Juan Moreno v. Potrero, Inc. et al
Juan Moreno |
Potrero, Inc., Does and Tsay J & R, LLC |
2:2010cv03625 |
May 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
George H. King |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 68 by Judge George H. King, in favor of Juan Moreno against Potrero, Inc.: On September 3, 2010, defendant Potrero, Inc. served an Offer of Judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re, Rule 68 on the plaintiff. On September 8, 2010, the plaintiff filed "Plaintiff's Acceptance of the Defendants' Rule 68 Offer." Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall have judgment against Defendant POTRERO, INC. in the total amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000); 2. Defendant POTRERO, INC. is ordered to (1) insulate the plumbing lines underneath the lavatories, (2) provide an accessible paper towel dispenser, and provide an accessible door for t he existing accessible toilet stall at the night club located at 4959 Patata Street, Cudahy, California the work to be done in compliance with the ADAAG and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. The court reserves jurisdiction for execution of the terms of the settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Judgment on counsel for all parties. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.