Health Facilities of California Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. British American Insurance Group, Ltd. et al
Health Facilities of California Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. |
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Catlin Insurance Company Ltd., British American Insurance Group, Ltd., Aspen Insurance UK Ltd., Ace European Group Ltd., AON Corporation, AON Benfield and Peter Myrtle |
2:2010cv03736 |
May 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jay C. Gandhi |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) Pending before the Court is Health Facilities of California Mutual Insurance Company , Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration of this Courts January 11, 2011 Order dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court DENIES the Motion for Reconsideration... denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order- Terminated Case 86 (lw) |
Filing 86 MINUTE:(In Chambers) Order Dismissing the Case for Lack of Subject MatterJurisdiction IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.