Michael Bell v. Linda L. Sanders
Petitioner: Michael Bell
Respondent: Linda L. Sanders
Case Number: 2:2010cv03739
Filed: May 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero, In accordance with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this action is dismissed with prejudice. 17 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Bell v. Linda L. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Linda L. Sanders
Represented By: Allen W Chiu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?