Carson Cheng et al v. AIM Sports, Inc. et al
| Carson Cheng and New Century SCI & Tech, Inc. |
| AIM Sports, Inc., Combat Optical, Inc., Juan Covarrubbias, Guoping Cui, Ying Cui, Micro World Corp., Qingdao Amber Sports Co., Ltd. and Shandong International Economic & Technical Development Co., LTD |
| 2:2010cv03814 |
| May 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
358
FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTON by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Plaintiffs Carson Cheng ("Cheng") and New Century Sci & Tech, Inc. ("NCS&T") (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants AIM Sports, Inc. (" ;AIM Sports"), Guoping Cui ("G. Cui"), Ying Cui ("Y. Cui"), Shandong International Economic & Technical Development Co., Ltd. ("SIET"), Combat Optical, Inc. ("Combat Optical"), and Juan Covarrubias (" Covarrubias") (collectively "Defendants") hereby stipulate and jointly move for entry of final judgment as follows: The parties have entered into a settlement agreement to resolve their dispute. Pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. &# 167; 283, Defendants and each of them stipulate that Defendants, together with their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates thereof, representatives and attorneys,and all persons acting or attempting to act in concert or part icipation with them, are permanently enjoined and restrained. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees for this action. No other or further relief is granted to any party. The parties advise that they affirmatively waiver any and all rights to appeal this Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. This Court retains jurisdiction to monitor and enforce compliance with this Permanent Injunction. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ir)
|
|
Filing
114
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Construing Patent Claims by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs' and Defendants' proposed Markman patent claims constructions. After considering the moving and opposing papers, as well as argument at the March 4, 2011 hearing, the Court construes the contested patent claims as follows. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing
68
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order Granting Defendants Motion to Quash Service 45 . Plaintiffs have 60 days to serve QASCO until March 26, 2011or QASCO will be dismissed as a defendant IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
|
Filing
57
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 56 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. **NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT** (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
