Jay Johnson et al v. Robert M. Goldsmith et al
| Margie Johnson and Jay Johnson |
| Robert M. Goldsmith and Catherine H. Goldsmith |
| Robert Galen Barbour and J. Michael Sharman |
| 2:2010cv03907 |
| May 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Judgment is for plaintiffs JAY JOHNSON and MARGIE JOHNSON ("Plaintiffs") and against ROBERT M. GOLDSMITH and CATHERINE H. GOLDSMITH ("Defendants"), and each of them, on each claim. Plaintiffs shall recover from the Defendants: $49,000.00 which represents actual damages; Interest in the amount of $27,560.55; Reasonable attorney fees, and expenses in the amount of $8,115.37; Punitive damages in the amount of $98,000; Post-Interest shall apply to the Judgment amount calculated according to 28 U.S.C 1961(a). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
