Ruchell Cinque Magee v. K. Clark
Petitioner: Ruchell Cinque MaGee
Respondent: K. Clark
Case Number: 2:2010cv04072
Filed: June 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rosalyn M. Chapman
Presiding Judge: Audrey B. Collins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Audrey B. Collins, Pursuant to the Opinion and Order on a petition for habeas corpus, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus of vexatious litigant Ruchell Magee, aka Ruchell Cinque Magee, is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to the Order dated March 3, 1999.IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that the successive habeas corpus petition is summarily dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruchell Cinque Magee v. K. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruchell Cinque MaGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?