Michael Fouad Georgy v. U.S. Department Homeland Security
Petitioner: Michael Fouad Georgy
Respondent: U.S. Department Homeland Security
Case Number: 2:2010cv04493
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge: Terry J. Hatter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the pending Petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction for the reasons set forth in the related Order Dismissing Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (db)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Fouad Georgy v. U.S. Department Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Department Homeland Security
Represented By: David E Pinchas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Fouad Georgy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?