Professional Security Consultants, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2010cv04588
Filed: June 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order 27 . (See Order for Details) (rp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Professional Security Consultants, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Fire Insurance Company
Represented By: William D Naeve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Represented By: Mathew Scott Koller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?