Jeong Ko v. City of La Habra et al
| Jeong Ko |
| City of La Habra and Does |
| 2:2010cv05305 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
JUDGMENT FOLLOWING COURT TRIAL by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (See document for further details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
|
|
Filing
72
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Jeong Kos motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety. Judgment is hereby entered as follows:1. Plaintiff shall be entitled to damages from Defendant in the amount of $24,518.25 for Defendants failure to advance Plaintiff to the proper Step-Pay rate for time spent on military leave in violation of USERRA; (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
|
|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff Jeong Kos motion for summary judgment is denied, that Defendant City of La Habras motionfor summary judgment is granted in its entirety, that Plaintiff Joung Ko takenothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits, and that Defendant City of La Habra take judgment, and, as the prevailing party, recover its costs from Plaintiff Jeong Ko. 28 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
