Raul Cobarrubias v. HSBC Bank USA, NA
Plaintiff: Raul Cobarrubias
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, NA
Case Number: 2:2010cv05560
Filed: July 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge: Oswald Parada
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court having previously issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution and plaintiff not having timely responded, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff take nothing, andthat the action be dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ake)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raul Cobarrubias v. HSBC Bank USA, NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raul Cobarrubias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?