Jacinto Gutierrez v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Jacinto Gutierrez v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.

Jacinto Gutierrez v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.

Plaintiff:	Jacinto Gutierrez
Defendant:	Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
Case Number:	2:2010cv05913
Filed:	August 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge:	Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit:	Real Property: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 16, 2010	Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 9/8/2010, this Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 7 . Response to the order to show cause was required no later than 9/22/2010. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause. The Court has found it lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1331. Furthermore, t here does not appear to be any alternative basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over this action. Without a showing that plaintiff invoked a federal claim or that plaintiff's right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substa ntial question of federal law, this Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1331. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the instant action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 16, 2010

Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 9/8/2010, this Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 7 . Response to the order to show cause was required no later than 9/22/2010. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause. The Court has found it lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Section 1331. Furthermore, t here does not appear to be any alternative basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over this action. Without a showing that plaintiff invoked a federal claim or that plaintiff's right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substa ntial question of federal law, this Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1331. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the instant action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacinto Gutierrez v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacinto Gutierrez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?