Russell Buchanan v. Neighbors Van Lines et al
Russell Buchanan |
Does, Neighbors Van Lines and A Golden Hand Moving |
2:2010cv06206 |
August 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rosalyn M. Chapman |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 ORDER DISMISSING NEIGHBORS VAN LINES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action against Neighbors Van Lines is dismissed, with prejudice, re Stipulation to Dismiss Party 154 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lw) |
Filing 133 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant Neighbors Van Lines motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against Defendant A Golden Hand Moving; and DENYING Defendant A Golden Hand Moving's motion for amendment of admissions. by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Before the Court are Defendant Neighbor's Van Lines motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff Russell Buchanans motion for summary judgment, and Defendant A Golden Hand Moving's motion for amendment of admissions. A hearing on the motions was held on October 11, 2011. After considering the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court GR ANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Neighbors Van Lines' motion, GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs motion, and DENIES Defendant A Golden Hand Moving's motion... (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion for Summary Judgment.; granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 114 Motion for Admissions (lw) |
Filing 67 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order Denying Lottie Cohen's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel Without Prejudice by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Pending before the Court is Lottie Cohen's motion to be relieved as counsel for Defendant A Golden Hand Mov ing and Storage, LLC. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court DENIES the motion. February 14 hearing vacated. denying 47 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw) |
Filing 39 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Granting Defendant Neighbors Van Lines Motion to Dismiss by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Neighbors' Motion to Dismiss Claims One, Two, Three, Four, Five and Eight of Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. If Plaintiff fails to amend the Complaint by December 20, 2010, the Court will dismiss those claims against Neighbors with prejudice. (lw) |
Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying 14 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Writ of Possession and Turnover Order: Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's ex parte application for a writ of possession and transfer order. (see document for further details) (bm) |
Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: denying 5 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Writ of Possession, Turnover Order and/or Temporary Restraining Order: Because Plaintiff has failed to state facts necessary to meet the requirements of federal law and the rules governing this Court, Plaintiffs application for ex parte relief is DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.