Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Heriberto Rodriguez |
| County of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles Sheriff's |
| 2:2010cv06342 |
| August 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
818
AMENDED JUDGMENT 817 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, in favor of Heriberto Rodriguez against County of Los Angeles, Adolph Esqueda, Alejandro Hernandez Castanon, Andrew Lyons, Blake Orlandos, Christopher Blasnek, Clayton Stelter, Daniel Cruz, Franc isco Alonso, Hector Vazquez, Herman Delgado, Javier Guzman, Joseph Sanford, Justin Bravo, Kelley Washington, Matt Onhemus, Matthew Thomas, Michael Frazier, Michel McGrattan, Nicholas Graham. (see document for further details) Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 817 (bm)
|
|
Filing
626
JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: AS TO PLAINTIFF HERIBERTO RODRIGUEZ: Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Heriberto Rodriguez against Defendants, the County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, Sergeant Michel McGrattan, Dep uty Francisco Alonso, Deputy Clayton Stelter, Deputy Joseph Sanford and Deputy Alejandro Hernandez-Castanon, to recover jointly and severally the sum of $90,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Heriberto Rodriguez against Defendant Daniel Cruz, to recover the sum of $15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Heriberto Rodriguez against Defendant Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, to recover the sum of $12,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Herib erto Rodriguez from Defendant Sergeant Michel McGrattan, to recover the sum of $10,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Matthew Nowotny, Antonio Galindo, Adolph Esqueda and Matthew Thomas against Plaintiff Heriberto Rodriguez for t he 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claim. AS TO PLAINTIFF JUAN CARLOS SANCHEZ: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Carlos Sanchez against Defendants, the County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, Sergeant Michel McGrattan, Deputy Francisco Alonso, Deputy Adolph Esqueda, Deputy Matthew Thomas, Deputy Joseph Sanford and Deputy Alejandro Hernandez-Castanon, to recover jointly and severally the sum of $200,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Carlos Sanchez against Defendant Daniel Cruz, to recover the sum of $15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Carlos Sanchez against Defendant Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, to recover the sum of $12,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Carlos Sanchez against Defendant Sergeant Michel McGrattan, to recover the sum of $10,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Matthew Nowotny, Antonio Galindo and Clayton Stelter against Plaintiff Juan Carlo s Sanchez for the 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and California Civil Code Section 52.1 claims. AS TO PLAINTIFF ERICK NUNEZ: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Erick Nunez against Defendants, the County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Lieutenant Christop her Blasnek, Sergeant Michel McGrattan, Deputy Francisco Alonso, Deputy Matthew Thomas, Deputy Clayton Stelter, Deputy Joseph Sanford and Deputy Alejandro Hernandez-Castanon, to recover jointly and severally the sum of $100,000.00. Judgment is e ntered in favor of Plaintiff Erick Nunez against Defendant Daniel Cruz, to recover the sum of $15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Erick Nunez against Defendant Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, to recover the sum of $12,000. 00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Erick Nunez against Defendant Sergeant Michel McGrattan, to recover the sum of $10,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Matthew Nowotny, Antonio Galindo and Adolph Esqueda against Plain tiff Erick Nunez for the 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and California Civil Code Section 52.1 claims. AS TO PLAINTIFF CARLOS FLORES: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Carlos Flores against Defendants, the County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Lieutena nt Christopher Blasnek, Sergeant Matthew Onhemus, Deputy Andrew Lyons, Deputy Javier Guzman, Deputy Hernan Delgado, and Deputy Justin Bravo, to recover jointly and severally the sum of $200,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Carlo s Flores against Defendant Daniel Cruz, to recover the sum of$15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Carlos Flores againstDefendant Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, to the sum of $12,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plai ntiff Carlos Flores against Defendant Sergeant Matthew Onhemus, to recover the sum of $30,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Carlos Ortega, Adrian Ruiz and Clayton Stelter against Plaintiff Carlos Flores. Judgment is entered as a matter of law under FRCP Rule 50 in favor of Defendant Armando Gonzalez against Plaintiff Carlos Flores. PLAINTIFF JUAN TRINIDAD: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Trinidad against Defendants, the County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Lie utenant Christopher Blasnek, Sergeant Kelley Washington, Deputy Michael Frazier, Deputy Blake Orlandos, Deputy Nicholas Graham, and Deputy Hector Vazquez, to recover jointly and severally the sum of $150,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of P laintiff Juan Trinidad against Defendant Daniel Cruz, to recover the sum of $15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Trinidad against Defendant Lieutenant Christopher Blasnek, to recover the sum of $12,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Juan Trinidad against Defendant Sergeant Kelley Wahshington, to recover the sum of $15,000.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Ivan Delatorre, Arthur Diaz, Jr., Enrique Cano and John McNicholas against Pl aintiff Juan Trinidad. Any motion for attorney's fees or application to tax costs shall be filed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Local Rules following the entry of Judgment by the Court. See document for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
