Mr. Vernon D. Carroll, Sr. v. S. Read et al
| Mr. Vernon D. Carroll, Sr. |
| Gray Sandor, D. Caplan, M. J. Dimmitt, Mr. Ellis, G. Lares, Nr. S. Read and Gary Sandor |
| 2:2010cv06964 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Pursuant to the Order Summarily Dismissing Action 120 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 98 by Judge Cormac J. Carney: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs SAC for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and fa ilure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 95 is granted with leave to amend; that defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs SAC based on qualified immunity is denied without prejudice; and plaintiff is ordered, if he still desires to pursue this action, to file a Third Amended Complaint remedying the deficiencies discussed in the Report and Recommendation within thirty (30) days of the service of this Order. (ad)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs Complaint based on Eleventh Amendment immunity is DENIED as mo ot; 2. Defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs Complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is DENIED without prejudice; 3. Defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs Complaint for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and failure to stat e a claim upon which relief can be granted is GRANTED with leave to amend; 4. Defendants Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs Complaint based on qualified immunity is DENIED without prejudice ; and 5. If plaintiff still desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint remedying the deficiencies discussed above within thirty (30) days of the service of this Order. 25 (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
