Qwest Communication Company, LLC v. Sun Coast Merchandise Corporation
| Qwest Communication Company, LLC |
| Sun Coast Merchandise Corporation |
| 2:2010cv07145 |
| September 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
AMENDED JUDGMENT 58 by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Qwest Communications Co. LLC shall have judgment in its favor against defendant Sun Coast Merchandise Corp. in the amount of $9,733,626.04, plus simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum to the date of the filing of this Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant take nothing and that Plaintiff shall have its attorneys' fees and costs of suit in the amount of $170,890.40. (gk)
|
|
Filing
58
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Qwest Communications Co. LLC shall have judgment in its favor against defendant Sun Coast Merchandise Corp. in the amount of $9,733,626.04, plus simple interest at the rate of 9% per annum to the date of the filing of this Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant take nothing and that Plaintiff shall have its costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
22
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Judge Percy Anderson. *See document for details.* (vdr)
|
|
Filing
6
MINUTES OF Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service. In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accord ingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 11/10/2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Qwest Communication Company, LLC v. Sun Coast Merchandise Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sun Coast Merchandise Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Peter Csato |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Qwest Communication Company, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Samuel D Almon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
