United States of America v. $33,905.00 In U.S.Currency
United States of America |
$33,905.00 In U.S.Currency |
Eliot Damone Franks |
2:2010cv07174 |
September 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Victor B. Kenton |
George H. King |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge George H. King: The United States of America shall have judgment as to the defendant $33,905.00 in U.S. currency and all interest earned thereon. No other person or entity shall have any right, title or in terest in the forfeited currency. The United States Marshals Service is ordered to dispose of the forfeited currency in accordance with law. Claimant hereby releases the United States of America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including employee s and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from any and all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of or related to this action, including, without limitation, any claim for attorneys fees, costs or interest which may be asserted on beh alf of claimants, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the defendant currency and institution of these proceedings. This judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.