Joan Hoyman et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
T. W. H., Thomas Patrick Harrison, Jennifer Hoyman and Joan Hoyman |
All Persons and Fictitious Entities, Claiming Any Equitable Right, Title, Estate Lien or Interest in Property Described in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title or Any Fraudulent Cloud on Pl, Aurora Loan Services LLC, Does, First Magnus Financial Corporation and Laura McCann |
2:2010cv07184 |
September 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline H. Nguyen |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Real Property: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: On 10/5/2010, Aurora filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim. With the motion to dismiss pending, Plaintiffs sought leave to file a first amended complaint. The Court granted Plainti ffs leave to file a first amended complaint by not later than 11/15/2010. Plaintiffs did not file a first amended complaint by the deadline. Instead, on 11/16/2010, Plaintiffs filed an application for an extension of time to file a first amended comp laint. The Court granted Plaintiffs an extension of time and ordered Plaintiffs to file the complaint by not later than 12/6/2010. Plaintiffs again have failed to file a first amended complaint by the ordered deadline. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.