Jacquelyne Hollander v. The Irrevocable Trust Established by James Brown in August 1, 2000 et al
| Jacquelyne Hollander |
| The Irrevocable Trust Established by James Brown in August 1, 2000, UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Group, Inc., Warner Music Group, Inc., Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. and Russell L. Bauknight |
| 2:2010cv07249 |
| September 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order DENYING Plaintiffs motion to vacate 36 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
|
Filing
33
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 17 Defendants' motion to dismiss, 22 JOINDER in MOTION to Dismiss: Thus, based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that the probate exception applies, and, accordingly, that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Defendants' motion to dismiss is therefore GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (see document for further details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff show cause in writing on orbefore May 6, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court wi ll consider the filing of the following on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause - Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Loca l Rule 7.15, oral argument will not be heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court. Counsel are advised that failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause, may result in the dismissal of the entire action. Parties are reminded that mandatory chambers copies of all electronically filed documents must be delivered directly to Courtroom 880 the following business day before Noon. Further, copies must include the E-Filed Notice and/or E-Filed Header. Failure to comply, may result in monetary sanctions. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
