Kim Edward Laube v. FURminator, Inc.

Kim Edward Laube v. FURminator, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Kim Edward Laube
Defendant:	FURminator, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2010cv07328
Filed:	October 1, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Ronald S.W. Lew
Presiding Judge:	Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 5, 2011	Filing 58 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal With Prejudice. While the Court finds that Plaintiff Laube must be given the opportunity to prosecute his individual claim, the Court also finds t hat Plaintiff has failed to adhere to the interests of judicial economy and efficiently litigate his individual claim. Accordingly, the Court AMENDS its January 28, 2011 Order by GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff Laube's single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship and Assignment of Patent Rights. (lom)
January 28, 2011	Filing 47 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, re Defendant Defendant FURminator Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 13 . The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to the single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship an d Assignment of Patent Rights. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to the single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship and Assignment of Patent Rights. Furthermore, the Court fin ds that granting leave to amend would be futile because this Action is duplicative of the 2009 California Lawsuit also before this Court. Additionally, the Court finds that Plaintiff Kim Laube is in privity with the Plaintiff in the 2009 Action, Kim Laube & Co. Inc. given that Kim Laube is the president and sole shareholder of Kim Laube & Co. Inc. Accordingly, the Court finds that this Action should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 13 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 5, 2011

Filing 58 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal With Prejudice. While the Court finds that Plaintiff Laube must be given the opportunity to prosecute his individual claim, the Court also finds t hat Plaintiff has failed to adhere to the interests of judicial economy and efficiently litigate his individual claim. Accordingly, the Court AMENDS its January 28, 2011 Order by GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff Laube's single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship and Assignment of Patent Rights. (lom)

January 28, 2011

Filing 47 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, re Defendant Defendant FURminator Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 13 . The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to the single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship an d Assignment of Patent Rights. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to the single cause of action for Declaratory Relief for Correction of Inventorship and Assignment of Patent Rights. Furthermore, the Court fin ds that granting leave to amend would be futile because this Action is duplicative of the 2009 California Lawsuit also before this Court. Additionally, the Court finds that Plaintiff Kim Laube is in privity with the Plaintiff in the 2009 Action, Kim Laube & Co. Inc. given that Kim Laube is the president and sole shareholder of Kim Laube & Co. Inc. Accordingly, the Court finds that this Action should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 13 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim Edward Laube v. FURminator, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Edward Laube
Represented By:	Marc E Hankin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: FURminator, Inc.
Represented By:	Matthew A Braunel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?