Contessa Premium Foods, Inc. et al v. CST Lines, Inc. et al
Zurich American Insurance Company and Contessa Premium Foods, Inc. |
CST Lines, Inc., Does and Far East Carrier LLC |
Far East Carrier LLC |
CST Lines, Inc. |
2:2010cv07426 |
October 5, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald S.W. Lew |
Frederick F. Mumm |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting 42 Plaintiffs Contessa Premium Foods, Inc. and Zurich American Insurance Company's Application for Default Judgment against Defendant Far East Carrier, LLC (hereafter "Defendant Far East Carrier") 42 . Accordingly, the Court awards damages against Defendant Far East Carrier in the amount of $93,039.87. (lom) |
Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting 19 Plaintiffs Contessa and Zurich's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 20 Defendant CST Lines's Cross-Motion. The Court awards Plaintiffs damages of $97,419.87 subject to reduction of $4,380.00 if Defendant CST lines withdraws its freight charge invoice. The Court also awards $37,387.32 in attorneys' fees to Plaintiffs. (lom) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE; TIMELY REMOVAL by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court is in receipt of Defendant CST Lines Inc.'s Notice of Removal. The Court hereby orders Defendant to show cause within 10 days as to if this action was timely removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446. (lom) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.