Antonio S. Hinojos v. Kohl's Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Antonio S. Hinojos
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Kohl's Corp. and DOES
Case Number: 2:2010cv07590
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II Granting Plaintiff's 86 Ex Parte Application to File a Second Amended Complaint. (mg)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Notice of Lodging 70 . WHEREAS the parties to these actions, Antonio S. Hinojos, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., believe that certain information that is or may be sought by discovery requests or otherwise in these actions constitutes trade secrets or other confidential research, development, financial or commercial information within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the approval of the Court, that: (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. ****** NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. *****) (mp)
December 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISCHARGING Court's Order to Show Cause; GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Claims One Through Four of Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint 8 (Filed 10/19/10) by Judge Otis D Wright II. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. As noted above, because Defendants failed to challenge Plaintiffs claim under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, this claim survives. The Courts Order to Show Cause 15 is DISCHARGED. (sch)
November 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D Wright, II Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/29/2010. (rne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antonio S. Hinojos v. Kohl's Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Angel A Garganta
Represented By: Gabriel J Padilla
Represented By: James F Speyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Corp.
Represented By: Angel A Garganta
Represented By: Gabriel J Padilla
Represented By: James F Speyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio S. Hinojos
Represented By: Matthew J Zevin
Represented By: Derek J Emge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?