Shlomo Eplboim v. Ifrach Family Living Trust #1 et al
| Shlomo Eplboim |
| Ifrach Family Living Trust #1, Ifrach Family Living Trust #2, Abraham Ifrach Ira and Shoshana Ifrach Ira |
| 2:2010cv07660 |
| October 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) The 9/14/2010 Arbitration Award issued in Case No. 08-03317 is confirmed in all respects; (2) Petitioner/counter-respondent Shlomo Eplboim ("Petitioner") shall pay respondents/counter-petitioners Ifrach Family Living Trust #1, Ifrach Family Living Trust #2, Shoshona Ifrach IRA, and Abraham Ifrach IRA ("Respondents") the unpaid compensatory damages owed to Respondents, in the amount of $ ;85,061.00; (3) Petitioner shall pay Respondents pre-judgment interest on late paid compensatory damages at the rate of ten percent per annum (or $23.30 per day), from 9/14/2010 to 9/19/2010, in the amount of $8,621; (4) Petitioner shall pa y Respondents post-judgment interest on the principal judgment amount at the statutory rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a), thereafter, until all compensatory damages are paid in full; and (5) Petitioner shall pay Respondent's costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
