Potrero, Inc. v. Red Eye Entertainment Inc. et al
| Potrero, Inc. |
| Does, EJ Lopez, Jimmy Mendez, Red Eye Entertainment Inc. and Erick Gonzalez Roman |
| 2:2010cv07978 |
| October 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MINUTES OF Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service. In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accord ingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 5/4/2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argumen t. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 4/26/2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (vdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
