Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLC v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama et al
| Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLC |
| Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, BCBSM, Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Missouri, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island, Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama, Capital Blue Cross, Care First of Maryland, Inc., Community Insurance Company, Inc., Does, Health Care Service Corporation, Healthchoice Assurance, Inc., Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Pennsylvania, Inc., Premera Blue Cross, Premera Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alaska, Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon, Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Utah and Wellmark, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv08385 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Dismissal of Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) 173 by Judge A. Howard Matz that the above-entitled action City shall be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the FRCP; and Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
133
**SEE ORDER AT 132**MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Having reviewed Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLCs Amended Status Report, filed on December 5, 2011 (Dkt. 129), and having accepted the transfers of Prime Healthcare Centin ela, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al, CV 11-8240 and Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, et al., CV 11-8499 from Judges Dale S. Fischer and John A. Kronstadt respectively, the Court now ORDERS counsel for Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLC to file a Summary Chart of Centinela Hospital Lawsuits. The summary chart must be filed by no later than January 3, 2011. See order for required format of chart. (jre) Modified on 12/20/2011 (jre).
|
|
Filing
125
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court ORDERS the parties in this case to file a joint status report, by no later than noon on November 18, 2011, which identifies every lawsuit that was filed in this district by Prime Healthcare Centinela, LLC since January 1, 2008 involving claims against insurers for unpaid hospital bills. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
61
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: the Court hereby ORDERS counsel forPlaintiff and all counsel for all defendants to meet and confer, which they can do telephonically, and to propose a single, coordinated, and comprehensive schedule for the filing of pleadings and responses. The Parties are ORDERED to thereafter file a single stipulation containing and explaining their proposal for such unified framework for the filing of responsive pleadings in this action. Only the dates for the fili ng of responsive pleadings are to be included in this stipulation. The Parties are ORDERED to file the above stipulation by not later than 3/18/2011. The Parties are also ORDERED to participate in a Telephonic Status Conference on 3/28/2011 at 1:30 PM. The parties are ordered to contact the Deputy Clerk at (213) 894-5283 for further instructions about the telephonic conference. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
