Native American Arts, Inc. v. Harris Marcus Home, Inc.
| Native American Arts, Inc. |
| Harris Marcus Home, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv09557 |
| December 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER RE STIPULATION RE SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE by Judge Dale S. Fischer Related to: Stipulation for Settlement 73 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant Harris Marcus having consented to the entry of an Injunction against Harris Marcus in favor of Native American Arts, a Consent Decree and Injunction (the Injunction) are hereby issued which Injunction hereby enjoins and restrains Harris Marcus, its officers, directors, shareholders, partners, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, agents, emplo yees, assigns and any person acting in concert with Harris Marcus for ten (10) years hereafter, from violating in any way the Indian Arts and Crafts Act, 25 U.S.C.§ 305 et. seq., as of the time of execution of this Agreement. The Court shall ret ain jurisdiction solely for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Consent Decree and Injunction set forth in paragraph 1 above. Except as necessary to enforce the terms of the Consent Decree and Injunction, this case is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own fees and costs pursuant to the Settlement Agreement reached by the parties.. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
