Anthony N Ozogu et al v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
| Anthony N Ozogu and Regina O Thomas |
| R K Arnold, CR Title Services Inc, Richard Cimino, CitiMortgage Inc, Citibank NA, Citimortgage Inc, Sanjiv Das, Does, Aaron Doty, First American Title Insurance Co, J Florez, Tameka Harris, Deepak Israni, Pam January, Kristen B Linder, MERSCORP Inc, Richard Martinez, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Orion Financial Group Inc, Pacifica L Nineteen LLC, Virkam S Pandit, Jennifer Wellborn, Mike E Wileman and iServe Servicing Inc |
| 2:2010cv09687 |
| December 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Banks and Banking |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of all defendants and against all plaintiffs as follows: (1) Counts 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 of the Com plaint are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend; and (2) The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remainder of plaintiffs' common law and state law claims, and DISMISSES them without prejudice. Each side shall bear its own fees and costs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) RE PACIFICA L. NINETEEN, LLC'S AND ISERVE SERVICING, INC.'S MOTION 5 ; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.'S AND CITIBANK, N.A.'S MOTION 31 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court hereby GRANTS CitiMortgage's and Citi bank's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' federal claims 31 . It appears that plaintiffs cannot cure the aforementioned deficiencies in their federal claims. Therefore, the Court finds it appropriate to dismiss plaintiffs' federal claims with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remainder of plaintiffs' common law and state law claims, and DISMISSES them without prejudice to plaintiffs asserting them in state court. The Court hereby DENIES Pacifica's and iServe's motion to dismiss the complaint, or, in the alternative, motion to strike punitive damages as moot 5 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order 22 . Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/15/2011. It appears the time limit to serve defendants with the summons and complaint has expired. Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE on or before 3/15/11, why the instant action should not be dismissed for insufficient service of process. (kpa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
