Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. KM Electronics, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products, Inc.
Defendant: Keith Paul Hower, KM Electronics, LLC and Does
Case Number: 2:2010cv10026
Filed: December 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINAL JUDGMENT, INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AGAINST DEFENDANT KM ELECTRONICS, LLC by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Defendant and any person or entity acting in concert with, or at the direction of its, including any and all agen ts, servants, employees, partners, assignees, distributors, suppliers, resellers and any others over which it may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116, from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizi ng or assisting any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United States and throughout the world: copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, marketing, selling, offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product o r service that uses, or otherwise making any use of, any Plaintiff's Monster trademarks, and/or any intellectual property that is confusingly or substantially similar to, or that constitutes a colorable imitation of, any of Plaintiff's Mons ter trademarks, whether such use is as, in or in connection with any trademark, service mark, trade name, logo, design, Internet use, website, domain name, metatags, advertising, promotions, solicitations, commercial exploitation, television, web-bas ed or any other program, or any other product or service. Plaintiff is entitled to recover and Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) on Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Declaratory Relief, (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. KM Electronics, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Paul Hower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KM Electronics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products, Inc.
Represented By: Marcus F Chaney
Represented By: Christopher Dain Johnson
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Represented By: Ani Sakalian
Represented By: Jason Robert Vener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?