USA v. Three digital devices seized on April 30, 2010, by the Cambodian National Police, from the residence of Alan Arthur Perry in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, and more specifically described herein
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Three digital devices seized on April 30, 2010, by the Cambodian National Police, from the residence of Alan Arthur Perry in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, and more specifically described herein (1)
Case Number: 2:2010mj01525
Filed: June 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Three digital devices seized on April 30, 2010, by the Cambodian National Police, from the residence of Alan Arthur Perry in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, and more specifically described herein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Three digital devices seized on April 30, 2010, by the Cambodian National Police, from the residence of Alan Arthur Perry in Sihanoukville, Cambodia, and more specifically described herein (1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?