USA v. Location in which beeper in UPS Express Courier Parcel 6788VRHZDK8 indicates the device has been activated, or visual surveillance indicates the container has been opened
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Location in which beeper in UPS Express Courier Parcel 6788VRHZDK8 indicates the device has been activated, or visual surveillance indicates the container has been opened (1)
Case Number: 2:2010mj02572
Filed: October 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Location in which beeper in UPS Express Courier Parcel 6788VRHZDK8 indicates the device has been activated, or visual surveillance indicates the container has been opened
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Location in which beeper in UPS Express Courier Parcel 6788VRHZDK8 indicates the device has been activated, or visual surveillance indicates the container has been opened (1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?