Jo Armuth v. John Linton et al
| Jo Armuth |
| Best Formulations, AG Skincare, LLC, Brett Saevitzon, DOES, Jonathan Flicker, Todd Kesselman, John Linton, Mercatis Media, LLC, Mercatis Ventures I LLC, Pinnacle Direct Marketing, LLC and Biozone Laboratories, Inc. |
| Aminogenesis LLC, Ron Cummings, Ronald Cummings, Nancy Lee Grahn and Roes |
| Todd Kesselman, Mercatis Media, LLC and Biozone Laboratories, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00220 |
| January 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has received the [Proposed] Order and Judgment on Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement. The Court notes that paragraph 10 of the proposed order states that there are 271 valid claim ants with a total of 531 approved purchases. As of August 2, 2012, Plaintiff reported in the motion for final approval of the class settlement that there were 276 valid claimants and a total of 536 approved purchases. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to explain this discrepancy by Friday December 7, 2012. (smo)
|
|
Filing
77
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Having received the parties Joint Status Report Regarding Proposed Distribution of Unclaimed Settlement Funds 76 , the Court hereby ORDERS that all unclaimed settlement funds shall be distributed through a cy pres award to the Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection. The parties are ORDERED to cooperate fully and promptly to provide the transfer of the funds in a manner consistent with FTC procedures. (jp)
|
|
Filing
75
MINUTES (N CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz. After further consideration following this mornings hearing, the Court awards plaintiffs' counsel $199,250.00. (jp)
|
|
Filing
41
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
