Southern California Edison Company v. City of Alhambra
| Southern California Edison Company |
| City of Alhambra |
| 2:2011cv00253 |
| January 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that SCE shall have judgment in its favor against defendant City of Alhambra on the first, second and seventh claims for relief in SCE's first amended complain t. SCE is hereby awarded compensatory damages against Defendant in the amount of $221,222. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and the stipulation of the parties, SCE is hereby awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $100,000. the rema ining claims in the first amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant take nothing and SCE shall have its costs of suit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Amended Judgment shall supersede the Judgment entered by the Court on June 6,2011 38 . (mg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER FOR AWARDS OF ATTORNEYS' FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1988 by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 39 , the Court hereby orders: In Case No. CV 11-00253 PA (JCx), plaintiff Southern California Edison Company is hereby awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $100,000 against defendant City of Alhambra. (gk)
|
|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison shall have judgment in their favor against defendant City of Alhambra on their claims for vio lation of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution and the California Constitution. Plaintiff Southern California Edison shall also have judgment in its favor on its claim for declaratory judgment. Pursuant to Plaintiffs' requests, the remaining claims in each of the Complaints are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant's counterclaims against Plaintiffs are also dismissed, in light of the Court's ruling on the claims for violation of the Contract Clause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant take nothing and that Plaintiffs shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
34
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re: Stipulation to Produce Concerning Inadvertent Production of Privileged Materials 31 . [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
