Marvin Eugene Jones v. Director of Finance et al
Plaintiff: Marvin Eugene Jones
Defendant: Director of Finance, John Doe, Doe 1, Chip Hazen, Terry Matsumoto and Deputy Director of Health Care Division
Case Number: 2:2011cv00471
Filed: January 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: In the above entitled cause, an Order granting Defendants Terry Matsumoto and Chip Hazen's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended complaint with prejudice was entered by this Court on 11/7/11 29 . Judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered. (ir)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING Defendants motion to dismiss theFirst Amended Complaint 18 . Plaintiff has until September 21, 2011 to file an amended pleading in accordance with this Order. As noted above, Plaintiff has leave to amend all cla ims save for his Section 1983 claim based on an alleged violation of his procedural due process rights. Failure to file an amended pleading by the deadline set forth above will result in dismissal of theclaims with prejudice IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marvin Eugene Jones v. Director of Finance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director of Finance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chip Hazen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Matsumoto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Director of Health Care Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marvin Eugene Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?