P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc. v. Prime Shipping International Inc. et al
Plaintiff: P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc.
Defendant: Prime Shipping International Inc., Guangdong Dongguan Bomei Packing Products Co. Ltd. and DOES
Counter Claimant: Prime Shipping International Inc.
Counter Defendant: P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00626
Filed: January 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL by Judge John A Kronstadt. On 1/11/2012, plaintiff filed Notice of Settlement 31 . The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for 3/12/2012 at 1:30 p.m. If the parties file a dismissal by 3/8/2012, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel will be required. The 1/13/2012 Status Conference, 2/27/2012 Final Pretrial Conference, 3/9/2012 Status Conference re Exhibits, and 3/13/2012 Jury Trial are vacated. (vdr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc. v. Prime Shipping International Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc.
Represented By: George Pascal Hassapis
Represented By: Cameron W Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Prime Shipping International Inc.
Represented By: Anne M Grignon
Represented By: Joseph N Mirkovich
Represented By: Margaret Eddy Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prime Shipping International Inc.
Represented By: Anne M Grignon
Represented By: Joseph N Mirkovich
Represented By: Margaret Eddy Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guangdong Dongguan Bomei Packing Products Co. Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: P.S. Customs Brokerage, Inc.
Represented By: Cameron W Roberts
Represented By: George Pascal Hassapis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?