Linley Investments et al v. Jerry Jamgotchian
| Chelston Ireland, Linley Investments, Lynch Bages Limited, Orpendale, Springcon and Wynatt |
| Jerry Jamgotchian |
| 2:2011cv00724 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
208
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (CLAIM OF EXEMPTION) DKT. 181 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Patricia Jamgotchians clai med exemptions based on California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 704.070 and 706.050 is denied. Patricia Jamgotchians claim of exemption for her alleged separate property based on California Code of Civil Procedure Section 704.210 is granted in pa rt and denied in part as follows: The claim of exemption for the $6,000 in the Checking Account that was deposited in cash is granted; Claim of exemption for the $27,000 in the Checking Account thatJerry Jamgotchian deposited via a check wr itten to him is denied; The claim of exemption for the remaining $3,174.08 in the Checking Account is granted. The Clerk is ordered to transmit a certified copy of the Courts Order to the levying officer requiring that the levying officer, subject to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 703.610, release the $9,174.08 to Patricia Jamgotchian and deliver the remainder of the property to Petitioners for satisfaction of their money judgment against Respondent. (shb)
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RE PETITIONERS MOTION FOR AN ASSIGNMENT ORDER (DKT. 139) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: See order for details. (shb)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER TO APPEAR FOR JUDGMENT DEBTOR EXAM. Re 128 APPLICATION for Appearance and Examination (Enforcement of Judgment) filed by plaintiff Linley Investments. JERRY JAMGOTCHIAN is ordered to appear for Judgment Debtor Exam on 7/18/2017 at 10:00AM before Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ib)
|
|
Filing
87
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ADJUDGED that: 1. The VERIFIED PETITION TO RECOGNIZE, CONFIRM AND ENFORCE FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS is granted; 2. Petitioners shall have Judgment against Respondent in the amount of$538,154. Said amount shall bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum from April16, 2014 until the date of payment. 3. The judgment amount includes the sum of the Arbitration Awards -- 301,783.25 -- and prejudgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum from Augu st 23, 2010 through April 15, 2014 -- 88,098.66. The award is based upon the prevailing exchange rate from Euros to U.S. dollars as of April 16, 2014. 4. Petitioners elected by their filing of a single Petition to have the 14 separate Arbitration Awa rds set forth in their Petition combined into a single judgment against Respondent. Any partial satisfaction of the Judgment by the Respondent will be credited against Respondents combined single liability on the entire judgment amount. Petitioners s hall be solely and exclusively responsible for allocating any and all payments received from Respondent, by virtue of this judgment, among them. 5. Petitioners, as the prevailing party, may submit a bill of costs and file a motion for attorneys fees. (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
