Chris Kohler v. Riverside Towne Center No. 1 et al
Plaintiff: Chris Kohler
Defendant: Ross Dress For Less, Inc., Riverside Towne Center No. 1 and Big 5 Corp.
Cross Defendant: Roes and Riverside Towne Center No. 1
Cross Claimant: Big 5 Corp.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00849
Filed: January 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald S.W. Lew
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew.The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, why all but the first named Defendant should not be dropped for misjoinder pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. Plaintiff's response to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to show cause, the Court will dismiss all but the first named Defendant from this action. (lom)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chris Kohler v. Riverside Towne Center No. 1 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ross Dress For Less, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverside Towne Center No. 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Big 5 Corp.
Represented By: G Michael Brown
Represented By: Dennis Chusam Kong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross defendant: Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross defendant: Riverside Towne Center No. 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Kohler
Represented By: Disabled Advocacy Group APLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross claimant: Big 5 Corp.
Represented By: Dennis Chusam Kong
Represented By: G Michael Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?