Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sung Hea Hwang et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Sung Hea Hwang and Sushi Phoenix, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv01027 |
| February 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| William D. Keller |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge William D. Keller the Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s), to show cause in writing no later than October 6, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/6/2011.), Set deadlines( Show Cause Response due by 10/6/2011.) (pg)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge William D. Keller, plaintiff(s), to show cause in writing no later than August 5, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer by the defendant; orPlaintiff(s) filing an Application for Default (FRCivP 55a) (pg)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge William D. KellerAnswer by the defendant; orPlaintiff(s) filing an Application for Default (FRCivP 55a) ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/16/2011.), Set deadlines( Show Cause Response due by 5/16/2011.) (pg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
