Dennis Lee Epps v. John F Salazar

Dennis Lee Epps v. John F Salazar

Petitioner:	Dennis Lee Epps
Respondent:	Warden John F Salazar
Case Number:	2:2011cv01161
Filed:	February 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 9, 2011	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PEITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, petitioner must submit to the Court NO LATE R THAN MARCH 2, 2011, documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit is sued such an order. Failure to respond by March 2, 2011, will result in the instant Petition being summarily dismissed without prejudice.2 See Reyes v. Vaughn, 276 F.Supp.2d 1027, 1029-30 (C.D. Cal. 2003) (dismissing successive petition without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek authorization from the Ninth Circuit). See Order for details. (ch)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 9, 2011

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF SUCCESSIVE PEITION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the instant Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Specifically, petitioner must submit to the Court NO LATE R THAN MARCH 2, 2011, documentation showing that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), he properly filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider a successive petition, and that the Ninth Circuit is sued such an order. Failure to respond by March 2, 2011, will result in the instant Petition being summarily dismissed without prejudice.2 See Reyes v. Vaughn, 276 F.Supp.2d 1027, 1029-30 (C.D. Cal. 2003) (dismissing successive petition without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek authorization from the Ninth Circuit). **See Order for details.** (ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dennis Lee Epps v. John F Salazar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden John F Salazar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis Lee Epps
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?