Griselda Farias v. Michael J Astrue

Griselda Farias v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Griselda Farias
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2011cv01170
Filed:	February 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 9, 2013	Filing 31 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $10,440.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 30 (es)
July 18, 2013	Filing 29 JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration and testimony concerning the types of jobs that plaintiff could perform and the numbers of those positions that exist in the economy. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 9, 2013

Filing 31 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $10,440.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 30 (es)

July 18, 2013

Filing 29 JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration and testimony concerning the types of jobs that plaintiff could perform and the numbers of those positions that exist in the economy. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Griselda Farias v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Geralyn A Gulseth
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Griselda Farias
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?