Nike, Inc. v. Karim Shareef Toney et al
| Nike, Inc. |
| Karim Shareef Toney and Does |
| 2:2011cv01605 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John F. Walter |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
CONSENT DECREE by Judge John F. Walter. The Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation re Entry of Proposed Consent Decree 19 . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, that the Permanent Injunction and findings made by the Court previously in t he Judgment Pursuant to Entry of Default, Docket No. 17 , shall remain in effect, and further ORDERS as follows: The monetary portion only, of the Judgment Pursuant to Entry of Default, Docket No. 17 , is vacated. This Consent Decree shall be deeme d to have been served upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree. The above-captioned action, shall, upon filing by Plaintiff of the Settlement Agreement, Joint Stipulation Re Entry Of [Proposed] Judgment, Proposed Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation, and requesting entry of judgment against Defendant, be reopened should Defendant default under the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
