Wayne D Winchester v. People of State of California
Petitioner: Wayne D. Winchester
Respondent: People of State of California
Case Number: 2:2011cv01639
Filed: February 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Presiding Judge: A. Howard Matz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 19 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 5 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wayne D Winchester v. People of State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wayne D. Winchester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of State of California
Represented By: Gregory J Marcot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?