Raymond Rodriguez v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Raymond Rodriguez v. Michael J Astrue

Raymond Rodriguez v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Raymond Rodriguez
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2011cv01789
Filed:	March 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Marc L. Goldman
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2012	Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth: Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 24 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,500 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)
November 22, 2011	Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Jean P Rosenbluth. It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioners request for an order affirming theCommissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and(3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiffs favor. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2012

Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth: Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 24 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,500 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)

November 22, 2011

Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Jean P Rosenbluth. It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioners request for an order affirming theCommissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and(3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiffs favor. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 22 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond Rodriguez v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Rodriguez
Represented By:	Brian C Shapiro
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Mary Beth O'Connor
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?