Franciska Susilo v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
| Franciska Susilo |
| Liz Doe, Monique Doe, Does, ETS Services LLC, Carlos Gonzalez, Erica Puentes, Wachovia Mortgage FSB, Wells Fargo Bank NA and Shanon De Arman |
| 2:2011cv01814 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: (1) Defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., is dismissed from this action with prejudice. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and against plaintiff Fransiska Susilo. (3) Plaintiff Fransiska Susilo shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Each side shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. (gk)
|
|
Filing
201
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine 1 to Exclude Testimony of Any Witnesses Who Are Employees of ETS 193 is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
183
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: granting 131 defendants motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court hereby GRANTS defendant summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for trespass, conversion, set aside trustee sale, set aside trustees deed, and violation of § 17200. Otherwise, defendants motion is DENIED. (lc). Modified on 11/21/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
159
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Her Complaint 126 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court orders that the caption and the docket in this case be amended to reflect the proper spelling of plaintiff's name: "Fransiska Susilo." All future filings must conform to this modification. Insofar as plaintiff wishes to add new claims or defendants, her motion is denied. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder Re: Wachovia's Motion to Dismiss 16 , Wachovia's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 17 , and ETS Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 13 . The Court's disposition defendants' motions is as follows. Each number signifies the corresponding claim: 1. Negligence: DENIED as to Wells Fargo and GRANTED as to ETS with prejudice. 2. Beach of Contract: DEN IED as to Wells Fargo's and GRANTED as to ETS without prejudice. 3. Negligent Misrepresentation: DENIED as to all defendants. 4. Fraud: DENIED as to all defendants. 5. Promissory Fraud: DENIED as to all defendants. 6. Trespass and Conversion: DE NIED as to all defendants. 7. Set Aside Trustee's Sale: DENIED as to all defendants. 8. Set Aside Trustee's Deed: DENIED as to all defendants. 9. Wrongful Foreclosure: DENIED as to all defendants. 10 Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good F aith and Fair Dealing: DENIED as to Wells Fargo's and GRANTED as to ETS without prejudice. 11. Violation of Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200 et seq.: DENIED as to all defendants. Finally, the Court DENIES Wells Fargo's motion to strike. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
