Keith Page v. Warren Stanley
| Keith Page |
| Calvin Aubrey, Robert Corral, Jose Salazar, W. G. Siegl, Warren Stanley and M. Steffanoff |
| 2:2011cv02255 |
| March 16, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
(IN CHAMBERS) - STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (Filed02/04/15) by Judge Christina A. Snyder, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 154 . The Court is in receipt of the above-referenced stipulation. No proposed order was submitted. The Court grants th e Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice. Plaintiff and defendant Robert Corral shall bear their own attorneys fees, costs and litigation expenses. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kss)
|
|
Filing
140
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record 127 is hereby GRANTED. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in the Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Stefanoff and Siegl are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (mr)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Christina A. Snyder for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 60 ; Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. Defendants Reque st for Judicial Notice is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants seek notice of state court dockets, proceedings and findings and DENIED to the extent that Defendants seek notice of controverted witness testimony to challenge Plaintiffs allegations. Plaintiffs Request for Leave to Amend the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED as unnecessary because the Court is ordering Defendants to Answer the Third Amended Complaint. Defendants shall file an Answer to the Third Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See order for details. (jy)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Christina A. Snyder for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 42 ; Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs false arrest claim is DENIED. Plaintiffs cla ims concerning Californias implied consent sobriety test and any related departmental policy are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs pre-trial detention, conspiracy, and failure to train and supervise claims are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEN D. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue his false arrest, pre-trial detention, conspiracy, and failure to train and supervise claims, Plaintiff shall file a Third Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order (May 31, 2012). See order for further details. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
