Mabel I Ponce v. Michael J Astrue

Mabel I Ponce v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Mabel I Ponce
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2011cv02380
Filed:	March 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge:	Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2012	Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation"), and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees pursuant to E qual Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/100's ($3,200.00) plus costs in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY dollars ($350.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation 22 . (wr)
January 26, 2012	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum andOrder 20 , it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2012

Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation"), and for cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees pursuant to E qual Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/100's ($3,200.00) plus costs in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY dollars ($350.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation 22 . (wr)

January 26, 2012

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth, For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum andOrder 20 , it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mabel I Ponce v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Geralyn A Gulseth
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mabel I Ponce
Represented By:	Shanny J Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?