David Ribot et al v. Farmers Insurance Group et al
| Lois Barnes, Anthony Butler, Jennifer Butler, Perry Hall, Jr, Jonathan Luna, Deborah Mills and David Ribot |
| 21st Century Insurance Company, AIG Insurance Services Inc, Farmers Insurance Exchange and Farmers Insurance Group |
| 2:2011cv02404 |
| March 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
328
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court GRANTS the Parties request for Final Approval of Class Action settlement. The Court finds that: (1) the settlement amount of $600,000 is fair and reasonable to the Class members. The Court further f inds that Class Counsels requested fees award of $200,000 (the Fee Award), which equals 33.33% of the Gross Settlement Amount, is reasonable. The Court approves Class Counsels request for recovery of $146,000in actual costs and expens es in prosecuting this Action and finds that said costs and expenses were reasonably incurred in the prosecution of this case. The Court approves the payment of the total Incentive Award of $24,000 with $3,000.00 payable to each of the Lead Plaintiffs, David Ribot, Anthony Butler, Jennifer Butler, Rita Dunken, Deborah Mills, Lois Barnes, Jonathan Luna, and Perry Hall, Jr. These payments are in addition to their individual settlement payments. The Court approves the payment of $29, 986 to Rust Consulting, as theappointed Settlement Administrator for the purpose of the Settlement, forreasonable administration costs incurred and to be incurred to conclude theadministration of this settlement. Defendant to pay the Settlement Administrator the Maximum Settlement Payment of $600,000. (See order for further details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
|
Filing
318
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT(SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). The hearing to consider final approval of the settlement, entry of a proposed final judgment, and Plaintiffs counsels application for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses, as well as an Enhancement Award to the Class Representatives, is hereby scheduled for November 30, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc). Modified on 10/9/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
283
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson : Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 279 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs Motion for Relief Under Rules 26 and 37 260 is DENIED; Plaintiffs Motion to Modify and Clarify Class Definitions ( 240 is DENIED in part insofar as it requests that 21st Century be added to the Rule 23 state law class definition; and Defendants Motion to Deny Certification as to 21st Century Class 256 is GRANTED. (lc). Modified on 6/4/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DENY CERTIFICATION AS TO 21ST CENTURY CLASS, PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULES 26 AND 37, AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 268 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: On February 24, 2014, Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion for Relief Under Rules 26 and 37.1 (Dkt. No. 260.) Plaintiffs contend that the court should not consider the releases on various grounds relating to the timeliness and completeness of Defendants discovery productions. Having consid ered the parties arguments, the court concludes that the matter of the releases is best addressed on a motion for summary judgment, prior to resolving the question of class certification for the 21st Century employees. Accordingly, Defendants are ord ered to file a motion for summary judgment by April 29, 2014. Plaintiffs Opposition must be filed by May 6, 2014. Defendants must file any Reply by May 13, 2014. The Motion shall be calendared for Monday, June 2, 2014 at 10:00 am.As to Plaintiffs Mot ion to Modify Scheduling Order 268 , the court grants in part and denies in part the Motion as follows:(1) Fact discovery is closed.(2) All other dates set in the courts August 8, 2013 Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 228) are vacated. A status conference regarding trial dates is set for June 30, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. The parties are ordered to meet and confer in advance of the status conference to develop proposed dates for a modified Scheduling Order. With respect to class lists, the courts December 2, 2014 Order to Extend Deadline to Produce Class Lists (Dkt. No. 225) is modified as follows: Defendants shall produce class lists for all class members, excluding putative class members from the Woodland Hills 21st Century facility, by May 7, 2014.Wi th respect to class notice, once the court has ruled on the forthcoming motion for summary judgment and the pending motions concerning the inclusion of the Woodland Hills 21st Century employees among the certified classes, the parties shall submit a revised proposed Notice of Class Action and Collective Action for the courts approval. (lc) Modified on 4/14/2014 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER CLARIFYING AND MODIFYING CLASS DEFINITIONS AND SPECIFYING PROCEDURES FOR CLASS NOTICE, CLASS LISTS, AND DISCOVERY by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 9/24/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
232
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson DENYING Defendants' Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal and for Stay 224 . (jp)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EQUITABLY TOLL LIMITATIONS PERIOD AND FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 209 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc) Modified on 7/18/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
222
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION 127 , 135 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc) . Modified on 7/18/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Denying Defendants' Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge's June 19, 2012 Order 57 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (sch)
|
|
Filing
52
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION **NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT** by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin (See attached order) (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
