Richard A Williamson v. Citrix Online LLC et al
| Richard A Williamson |
| Adobe Systems Inc, Blackboard Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Webex LLC, Citrix Online LLC, Citrix Systems Inc, Dimdim Inc, Elluminate USA Inc, Fuze Box Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Omnovia Technologies Inc, Salesforce.com Inc, Timebridge Inc, Tokbox Inc, Viack Corp, Video Seminar LIve LLC, WYBS Inc, Webex Communications Inc and Wimba Inc |
| 2:2011cv02409 |
| March 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
533
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: For the reasons set forth in the Court's February 17, 2016 Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 1. FINAL JUDGMENT is entered that claims 1, 3-6, 17-18, and 20-23 of U.S. Patent No. 6,155, 840 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 2. FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in Defendants' favor on all of Plaintiff's claims for relief. 3. The deadline for the parties to seek recovery of costs (including filing a Notice of Application a nd proposed Bill of Costs) and/or attorneys'fees is extended to thirty (30) days following issuance of the mandatein any appeal from this Final Judgment. 4. Subject to paragraph 3, all claims between the parties have now been resolved. This is a final and appealable judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vv)
|
|
Filing
477
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that FINAL JUDGMENT with respect to Plaintiff's claims of infringement of the '840 Patent against WebEx Communications, Inc., Cisco WebEx LLC, and Cisco Systems, Inc., Adobe Systems Incorporated, Citrix Online, LLC and Citrix Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Cisco, and Plaintiff shall take nothing of and from its claims of infringement of the '840 Patent against Cisco. All of Cisco's counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice, without waiving Ciscos right to reassert any or all of these claims in this action or another, including but no t limited to in the event that the appellate court remands the case to the District Court or refuses to hear the merits of the appeal. The deadline for the parties to seek recovery of costs (including filing a Notice of Application and proposed Bill of Costs) and/or attorneys' fees is extended to thirty (30) days following issuance of the mandate in any appeal from this Final Judgment. Subject to paragraph 6, all claims between the parties have now been resolved. This is a final and appealable judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
254
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 199 Motion to Dismiss Salesforce.com, Inc. and Dimdim Inc. for Misjoinder. The Court DISMISSES Salesforce.com, Inc. and Dimdim, Inc. from this action. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
213
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott 210 . (san)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
