Net-Com Services Inc v. Eupen Cable USA Inc et al
| Net-Com Services Inc |
| Kabelwerk Eupen AG, Charles Roper, Does and Eupen Cable USA Inc |
| 2:2011cv02553 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
239
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESTORE AND PRODUCE ELECTRONIC DATA (Dkt. Nos. 128 & 210 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Net-Com is ORDERED to restore and produce any relevant data from the subject hard drives within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Net-Com shall pay the full cost of restoration and production. (See document for further details). (mr)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER (1) DISMISSING FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) STRIKING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT (DOC. NO. 164); AND (3) VACATING THE MARCH 11, 2013 HEARING by Judge Jesus G. Bernal re: 164 Motion to Dismiss. (See document for specifics) (adu)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Contempt Citation by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court hereby orders David Kernan to show cause why the Court should not issue a contempt citation against him for failure to comply with the Court's subpoena. The Court will hold a hearing regarding possible contempt citations on June 20, 2012. As such, David Kernan and the Parties are hereby ordered to appear before the Court on June 20, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
