Larry Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc. et al
| Larry Brown |
| China Integrated Energy, Inc., Li Gaihong, Albert C. Pu and Gao Xincheng |
| 2:2011cv02559 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
370
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants China integrated Energy, Inc., Xincheng Gao, Gaihong Li, Junrong Guo, Albert C Pu, larry Goldman, and Christopher Wenbing Wang by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY OR DERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in theStipulation, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action and over all Parties to the Action, including Members of the Settlement Class. The Action against Defendants and all Released Claims are hereby DISMISSED in their entirety WITH PREJUDICE. The Settling Parties shall bear their own costs, except as and to the extent provided in the Stipulation and herein. (jp)
|
|
Filing
354
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SHERB & CO. LLP 353 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: The Action against Sherb and all Released Claims are hereby DISMISSED in their entirety WITH PREJUDICE. The Settling Parties shall bear their own costs, except as and to the extent provided in the Stipulation and herein. (See attached document for details. ) (lom)
|
|
Filing
195
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. **See attached Order for details.** (es)
|
|
Filing
193
MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On September 18, 2013, the Court ordered the parties, NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 24, 2013, to email their proposed protective orders, in either Word or Word Perfect format, to: pla_chambers@ ;cacd.uscourts.gov. To date, defendants have not done so. Accordingly, NO LATER THAN 12:00 noon PACIFIC TIME ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2013, defendants are ordered to show cause why their Motion for Protective Order (docket no. 191) should not be denied as a sanction for failure to follow Court orders. The timely emailing of defendants' proposed protective order (Exhibit 1 to Joint Stipulation in connection with defendants' Motion for Protective Order) shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. (ch)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow: Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/22/2012. (rne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
