Nancy Mabery v. Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff: Nancy Mabery
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv02598
Filed: March 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO LIFT STAY 17 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (MD JS-5 Case Reopened) (lc) Modified on 6/8/2012 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nancy Mabery v. Smith & Nephew Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Mabery
Represented By: Christina A L Fountain
Represented By: Troy A Brenes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
Represented By: Karen Michelle Firstenberg
Represented By: John W Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?